Our Focuses|Sustainable Supply Chain|Supply Chain Composition and Management Framework

Sustainable Supply Chain

Winbond anchored its sustainable supply chain program in "Practicing Responsible Procurement," and a "People-oriented", integrating ecosystem thinking into governance and day-to-day supply chain operations. Through the dual transformation pillars of digitalization and decarbonization, Winbond strengthened controls, data collection, and collaboration mechanisms to support measurable progress.
In a volatile operating environment, maintaining business continuity requires innovation and agile response. Winbond worked with suppliers through audits, training, and digital data systems to strengthen operational resilience and manage ESG risks across the supply base.
Winbond strengthened supplier engagement and expanded value-chain collaboration. In 2025, Winbond received an A rating in the CDP Supplier Engagement Assessment (SEA), achieving Leadership level recognition.
Through value-chain climate collaboration, Winbond supported partners’ low-carbon transition and co-developed a climate-resilient sustainable supply chain ecosystem.

SDGs 17 Partnerships for the Goals
SDGs 13 Climate Action
SDGs 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
SDGs 9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
SDGs 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

CDP Supplier Engagement Assessment

A List

OSAT Suppliers have Established Production Capacity for Renewable Energy-Based Products

100

%

Co-learning Hours of Eco Supply Chain System

56842

Hours

Supply Chain Composition and Management Framework

Declaration of Sustainable Supply Chain Management

 

Supply chain is the relationship between a company and its suppliers, including aspects such as materials, equipment, and services. Winbond, continuously established partnerships and work with suppliers to achieve ESG goals and promote sustainable development. This effort further enhances business ethics, environmental protection, social care, and transparency in governance structure.

Through responsible procurement, Winbond continuously enhances supply chain resilience and promotes a low-carbon
supply chain, collaborating with supplier partners to build a sustainable and resilient ecosystem.
 

Sustainable Supply Chain Management Framework

Sustainable Supply Chain Management Strategy and Policy

The Sustainable Supply Chain Team operated under the ESG Committee and was led by the Assistant Vice President of the Supply Chain Management Center to implement sustainable supply chain projects. To strengthen governance quality, the team adopted a regular reporting mechanism: semiannual reports to the committee on strategy and phased outcomes, and quarterly progress updates to the Office of Sustainable Development. These mechanisms ensured steady achievement of Winbond’s sustainable supply chain targets.
Building on responsible procurement, Winbond integrated requirements from the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct, Hazardous Substance Free (HSF) policy, traditional supplier management (quality, price, lead time, process technology capability), and Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) practices. Winbond further incorporated “environmental co-benefits” and “shared prosperity with partners” to drive sustainability across the supply chain. In 2025, Winbond adopted a net-positive mindset and positioned suppliers as partners that create positive impact. Through in-depth audits and coaching by third-party verification bodies, Winbond achieved 100% completion of supplier sustainability on-site audits in 2025 and strengthened execution capabilities across the supply base. Winbond also advanced dual digital and low-carbon transformation measures, with notable progress in ESG data collection for suppliers and OSAT suppliers, green production management, and internal green logistics systems.
based on international standards, incorporating human-centric principles into supply chain risk investigations, elevating it to due diligence.
 

 
1
Practice Responsible Procurement
  • New supplier traceability and sustainability selection
  • Signing of Integrity Commitment and Regular Awareness Advocacy
  • Compliance with Winbond Supplier Code of Conduct
  • No use of prohibited substances
  • No use of conflict minerals
  • Regular Supplier Sustainability Assessments
     
 
2
Strengthening Supply Chain Resilience
  • Internal Compliance Program, ICP
  • Authorized Economic Operator, AEO
  • Sustainable risk Due Diligence in the
    supply chain
  • Supplier on-site audits, coaching, improvement, and enhancement
  • Suppliers ESG ecosystem engagement and advocacy
  • Develop supply chain risk management plans (including climate change,
    environmental impact, human rights, governance, etc.)
  • Sustainable education and training by the Supply Chain Management Center
  • Engaging third-party verification bodies to conduct on-site audits of high-risk suppliers
 
3
Low-Carbon Supply Chain
  • Sustainable procurement (local, circular, and green procurement)
  • Conduct energy and resource usage surveys for major suppliers
  • Promotion of Carbon Emission Management among Suppliers/OSAT Suppliers
  • Management of Green Product Production Operations
  • Facilitate and guide sustainable resources in the supply chain
  • Internal green logistics systems management
  • Green product production management
     

Supply Chain Composition and Management Framework

Supply Chain Composition and Overview

Winbond is a key global memory manufacturer. Within the industry value chain, Winbond supports upstream IC/IP design needs, performs wafer manufacturing, and then—based on customer requirements across product lines—executes outsourced processing, packaging, and testing. Winbond delivers products to customers on time while considering economic and security requirements. In 2025, the Winbond Group operated primarily in Taiwan, with additional presence in Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Germany, the United States, and India. Nuvoton’s major operating sites were primarily in Taiwan and Japan, while its business sites were located across Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Israel, the United States, Germany, India, and Singapore to support customer service needs. To ensure on-time delivery, Winbond collaborates with diversified global suppliers across Taiwan, Japan, the United States, Mainland China, South Korea, Belgium, and Germany. Based on 2025 transaction activities, Winbond (Taiwan) worked with 1,100 suppliers, and Winbond (subsidiaries) worked with 698 suppliers. Please refer to the Nuvoton 2025 Sustainability Report.
Suppliers were categorized by procurement category and application, including raw materials, outsourcing, Outsourced semiconductor assembly and testing (OSAT), machinery and equipment, components and spare parts, maintenance and repair, facility engineering, and others (transportation and logistics, waste treatment vendors, waste hauling vendors, IT equipment and software, and general services).
 

Composition of Winbond Suppliers
Raw Materials
Outsourcing
OSAT
Components & 
Spare Parts
Machinery & Equipment
Maintenance &
Repair
Facility Engineering
Others

 

 

Winbond Supplier Management Cycle

 

A robust supplier partnership served as the foundation of Winbond’s supply chain operating system. Winbond implemented a systematic Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) management cycle—from early-stage sourcing and assess, to mid-stage regular supplier assessment, to late-stage deficiency follow-up and corrective actions—to secure stable supply relationships. Winbond not only maintained strict internal control over material technology but also emphasized external collaboration to advance SDG 17. Through close supplier interaction, audits, and continuous improvement, Winbond acted as both a supervisor and an enabler by providing resources and support to drive shared transformation.

Sourcing and Assessment of New Suppliers

Winbond’s new supplier selection mechanism included quality system assessments (covering quality, lead time, service, technology, and supplier’s quality system), the Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, and corporate sustainability requirements. As a member of the Internal Compliance Program (ICP) of the International Trade Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Winbond also screened UN Security Council and Taiwan Ministry of Justice sanctions lists at the traceability stage to safeguard supply chain security.
Suppliers that met compliance requirements were required to provide third-party quality system certificates, Process/Product Change Notice (PCN) management principles, and completed hazardous substances management questionnaires. For outsourced manufacturing suppliers for security products, additional third-party certificates and the “Security Product Outsourced Processing Safety Control Measures Checklist Questionnaire” were required. In 2025, the Winbond Group added 13 new suppliers (5 for Winbond Taiwan, 7 for Nuvoton Taiwan, and 1 for Nuvoton Japan), and 100% passed selection against economic, environmental, and social (including human rights) standards.

Winbond Supplier Code of Conduct Commitment Letter

To ensure a safe working environment in the supply chain, protect employees' dignity and respect, implement environmental responsibility, and adhere to ethical conduct, Winbond Electronics and its subsidiaries have developed the Winbond Electronics Supplier Code of Conduct in accordance with the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA, formerly EICC) Code of Conduct. Winbond requires suppliers to comply with this code and adhere to the laws and regulations of the countries and regions in which they operate. Suppliers are also encouraged to require their suppliers, contractors, and service providers to acknowledge and adopt this code.

The code consists of five sections:

  • Sections A, B, and C outline standards for labor, health and safety, and the environment, respectively.
  • Section D covers business ethics standards.
  • Section E details the elements necessary for a proper management system to enforce the code.

 

The formulation of this code draws on several international guidelines and standards: Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) for environmental management and audit systems. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ILO Declaration of Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and ILO Fundamental Conventions for human rights assessments. Social Accountability International (SAI, SA8000) and the United Nations Convention against Corruption for governance. These references collectively inform the comprehensive "Winbond Electronics Supplier Code of Conduct."

Regular Evaluation of Qualified Suppliers

Winbond conducted an annual evaluation for qualified suppliers. Reflecting Winbond’s production specialization, suppliers were grouped into (1) suppliers and (2) OSAT suppliers. The assessment scope covered core indicators such as quality, cost, delivery, and service. Results were managed through a tiered system: suppliers were categorized as A (excellent), B (good), or C (under review), while OSAT suppliers were graded as Excellent, A, B, or C. To advance sustainable supply chain transformation, Winbond incorporated sustainability performance into regular assessments starting in 2024 and increased the weighting from 5% to 15% in 2025, covering participation in sustainability activities, target-setting, and energy-saving and carbon reduction outcomes. An ESG penalty mechanism was introduced to ensure fairness. Suppliers that failed to meet standards were required to submit improvement plans within one month; persistent underperformance triggered a supplier offboarding process to maintain compliance and resilience.
In 2025, no suppliers in Winbond (Taiwan) were terminated due to major sustainability deficiencies. One supplier received a C grade and implemented improvement measures within one month; all other suppliers and OSAT suppliers achieved B grade or higher and A grade or higher, respectively. Winbond will continue proactive communication, monitoring of government enforcement disclosures, and tracking of supplier operating dynamics to ensure stable supply on a compliance basis, while providing positive incentives for suppliers with strong sustainability performance.
 

Mechanism to Incentivize Suppliers with Strong ESG Performance:

  1. Awards and public recognition are presented during supplier forums or contractor conferences.

  2. The Sustainable Supply Chain Team conducts ESG performance evaluations, audits, and provides capacity-building support for suppliers/contractors. The results are integrated into procurement decision-making processes through positive procurement incentives (e.g., preferential selection, increased order volume).

Example: If a supplier can demonstrate that 100% of waste generated during production is recycled or treated through circular methods, Winbond will increase the procurement volume under equal quality and cost conditions.

Qualified Supplier Audit and Improvement

To manage qualified suppliers’ operations effectively, Winbond’s supplier audit team conducted annual key-sample audits for all qualified suppliers. Desk audits verified valid certificates such as quality management and green review certifications. On-site audits, centered on the RBA 8.0 audit manual, conducted systematic sustainability assessments. In 2025, Winbond conducted 72 audit sessions (24 raw material suppliers, 16 OSAT suppliers, and 32 waste disposal suppliers), identifying 287 improvement recommendations. Compared with 2024, improvement items increased due to expanded sustainability coaching and supplier management needs. Suppliers submitted corrective action plans within agreed timelines, and none were removed from the qualified supplier list due to non-compliance in environment, safety, and health; labor and ethics; product and technical quality; or sustainability management systems. Winbond will expand high-frequency sustainability coaching and training to embed sustainability awareness into supply chain culture and strengthen practical capabilities.

 

Results of Regular Desk Audits on Qualified Suppliers across Economic, Environmental, and Social (including Human Rights) Aspects
ESG aspectAudit ItemsPass Rate

 

Economic

ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems

100%

IATF 16949:2016

100%

 

 

Environmental

ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems

100%

REACH

100%

RoHS

100%

HSPM Hazardous Substance Process Management

100%

Social 

(including human rights)

RBA Social Responsibilities

100%

 

Supplier ESG improvement actions

Aspect

Improvement Items

Response and Recommendations

Environmental, Health, and Safety

  • Inadequate maintenance of safety facilities: multiple emergency safety facilities (e.g., eye-wash station covers, insufficient water column height, expired medicines) were not maintained as required or were mislabeled, creating immediate risks.
  • Potential hazards in the workplace: piping in filling areas occupied walkways, creating route risks; personnel in receiving/testing areas did not wear PPE as required.
  • Insufficient planning for energy and water resources: in 2025, suppliers lacked clear plans to adopt renewable/clean energy or to manage water resources.
    Lack of recycled content
  • information for products: suppliers lacked clear planning or tracking of recycled content composition in supplied products.
     
  • Required suppliers to implement regular inspections and immediately rectify deficiencies related to occupational safety and health; ensured consistent labeling management across all equipment.
  • Required on-site management and safe route planning; mandated strict PPE compliance and incorporated PPE adherence into performance evaluation.
  • Required suppliers to set sustainability targets for energy and water and integrate them into long-term operating strategies and annual objectives.
  • Required suppliers to disclose product composition clearly and establish material sustainability plans or disclosure policies to improve transparency.
     

Fire protection
system

  • Emergency exits in receiving areas were obstructed by stored items.
  • Fire extinguishers in the packing room lacked control tags and periodic inspection data.
     
  • Required regular inspections and review of inspection records.
  • Required fire extinguishers to be tracked and regularly inspected, with inspection records maintained.
     

Labor & Ethics

  • Lack of diverse and anonymous employee communication channels: no anonymous suggestion/complaint box and insufficient confidentiality and protection measures.
  • Insufficient awareness and planning for human rights due diligence: limited understanding and no advanced planning or policies.
  • Insufficient protection mechanisms for vulnerable groups: failure to establish a pregnancy notification mechanism, compromising the protection of employee rights.
     
  • Required suppliers to establish diverse communication channels and confidentiality and protection mechanisms; recommended engaging an independent third party to manage anonymous cases to ensure impartiality and professionalism.
  • Required suppliers to develop a human rights policy, conduct human rights risk assessments, periodically map and assess potential negative impacts on human rights (including supply chains), identify high-risk groups and issues, and implement management plans with follow-up.
  • Required suppliers to develop a maternal health protection plan aligned with Ministry of Labor OSH Guidelines and establish a pregnancy-friendly reporting mechanism and process.
     

Product & Technical Quality

  • Inadequate equipment and instrument management: mismatched equipment status labels, missing pressure gauge control stickers, and test equipment not included in maintenance plans.
  • Disorganized material and product storage: conforming and non-conforming items mixed; different materials stored in the same location without clear labeling.
  • Incomplete process data and records: HF process testing was used to guide acid addition but values after acid replacement were not recorded, affecting traceability and analysis.
     
  • Required standardized status labeling for process equipment (e.g., running, down, abnormal), immediate repair and maintenance for abnormal readings, and ensured accurate monitoring.
  • Required improved storage management with zoning and 5S practices; recommended training for site managers, warehouse staff, and production staff to reduce quality risks.
  • Required standardized data recording; operators must immediately and completely record latest test values after each acid addition or replacement, and periodically analyze results.
     

Management System

  • Incomplete personnel and contractor management: differences in re-certification cycle definitions and execution; unclear contractor risk standards.
  • Mismatch between physical storage and management labeling: inventory records inconsistent with physical stock, risking misuse and traceability difficulties.
  • Incomplete environmental regulatory compliance data: waste reporting and pollution control equipment maintenance records required supplementary information after audits.
     
  • Required standardized re-certification cycle definitions and execution standards and inclusion in annual training and audit items; required clear definitions for quality and supply risk evaluation standards and periodic audits and tracking.
  • Required standardized labeling and 5S implementation with fixed-point visual management to ensure neat placement and clear labels.
  • Required suppliers to develop and strictly implement periodic maintenance and calibration plans for air and wastewater pollution control equipment; recommended digital management to input and archive environmental records in real time.
     

Corporate Sustainability

  • Insufficient environmental sustainability and emergency response management: lack of a regular verification mechanism for conflict mineral sourcing, and the emergency response plan is not periodically reviewed to ensure its effectiveness.
  • Unclear science-based carbon-reduction targets and strategies: limited understanding of Science Based Target initiative (SBTi) and no further planning or action.
  • Gaps in supply chain information security training: no information security training with regular value-chain partners, creating cybersecurity risks.
  • Required periodic verification of source stability and compliance, as well as establishment and periodic review and drills (e.g., annually or semiannually) for emergency plans with continuous improvement.
  • Encouraged targeted training on SBTi for key department personnel to strengthen understanding of climate change and carbon reduction targets.
  • Planned to make information security training a required condition for regular collaboration with value-chain partners and to conduct periodic online/offline training to build baseline security awareness.