Our Focuses|Sustainable Supply Chain|Supply Chain Composition and Management Framework

Sustainable Supply Chain

Winbond anchored its sustainable supply chain program in "Practicing Responsible Procurement," and a "People-oriented", integrating ecosystem thinking into governance and day-to-day supply chain operations. Through the dual transformation pillars of digitalization and decarbonization, Winbond strengthened controls, data collection, and collaboration mechanisms to support measurable progress.
In a volatile operating environment, maintaining business continuity requires innovation and agile response. Winbond worked with suppliers through audits, training, and digital data systems to strengthen operational resilience and manage ESG risks across the supply base.
Winbond strengthened supplier engagement and expanded value-chain collaboration. In 2025, Winbond received an A rating in the CDP Supplier Engagement Assessment (SEA), achieving Leadership level recognition.
Through value-chain climate collaboration, Winbond supported partners’ low-carbon transition and co-developed a climate-resilient sustainable supply chain ecosystem.

SDGs 17 Partnerships for the Goals
SDGs 13 Climate Action
SDGs 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
SDGs 9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
SDGs 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

CDP Supplier Engagement Assessment

A List

OSAT Suppliers have Established Production Capacity for Renewable Energy-Based Products

100

%

Co-learning Hours of Eco Supply Chain System

56842

Hours

Supply Chain Composition and Management Framework

Declaration of Sustainable Supply Chain Management

 

Supply chain is the relationship between a company and its suppliers, including aspects such as materials, equipment, and services. Winbond, continuously established partnerships and work with suppliers to achieve ESG goals and promote sustainable development. This effort further enhances business ethics, environmental protection, social care, and transparency in governance structure.

Through responsible procurement, Winbond continuously enhances supply chain resilience and promotes a low-carbon
supply chain, collaborating with supplier partners to build a sustainable and resilient ecosystem.
 

Sustainable Supply Chain Management Framework

Sustainable Supply Chain Management Strategy and Policy

The Sustainable Supply Chain Team operated under the ESG Committee and was led by the Assistant Vice President of the Supply Chain Management Center to implement sustainable supply chain projects. To strengthen governance quality, the team adopted a regular reporting mechanism: semiannual reports to the committee on strategy and phased outcomes, and quarterly progress updates to the Office of Sustainable Development. These mechanisms ensured steady achievement of Winbond’s sustainable supply chain targets.
Building on responsible procurement, Winbond integrated requirements from the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) Code of Conduct, Hazardous Substance Free (HSF) policy, traditional supplier management (quality, price, lead time, process technology capability), and Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) practices. Winbond further incorporated “environmental co-benefits” and “shared prosperity with partners” to drive sustainability across the supply chain. In 2025, Winbond adopted a net-positive mindset and positioned suppliers as partners that create positive impact. Through in-depth audits and coaching by third-party verification bodies, Winbond achieved 100% completion of supplier sustainability on-site audits in 2025 and strengthened execution capabilities across the supply base. Winbond also advanced dual digital and low-carbon transformation measures, with notable progress in ESG data collection for suppliers and OSAT suppliers, green production management, and internal green logistics systems.
based on international standards, incorporating human-centric principles into supply chain risk investigations, elevating it to due diligence.
 

 
1
Practice Responsible Procurement
  • New supplier traceability and sustainability selection
  • Signing of Integrity Commitment and Regular Awareness Advocacy
  • Compliance with Winbond Supplier Code of Conduct
  • No use of prohibited substances
  • No use of conflict minerals
  • Regular Supplier Sustainability Assessments
     
 
2
Strengthening Supply Chain Resilience
  • Internal Compliance Program, ICP
  • Authorized Economic Operator, AEO
  • Sustainable risk Due Diligence in the
    supply chain
  • Supplier on-site audits, coaching, improvement, and enhancement
  • Suppliers ESG ecosystem engagement and advocacy
  • Develop supply chain risk management plans (including climate change,
    environmental impact, human rights, governance, etc.)
  • Sustainable education and training by the Supply Chain Management Center
  • Engaging third-party verification bodies to conduct on-site audits of high-risk suppliers
 
3
Low-Carbon Supply Chain
  • Sustainable procurement (local, circular, and green procurement)
  • Conduct energy and resource usage surveys for major suppliers
  • Promotion of Carbon Emission Management among Suppliers/OSAT Suppliers
  • Management of Green Product Production Operations
  • Facilitate and guide sustainable resources in the supply chain
  • Internal green logistics systems management
  • Green product production management
     

Supply Chain Composition and Management Framework

Supply Chain Composition and Overview

Winbond is a key global memory manufacturer. Within the industry value chain, Winbond supports upstream IC/IP design needs, performs wafer manufacturing, and then—based on customer requirements across product lines—executes outsourced processing, packaging, and testing. Winbond delivers products to customers on time while considering economic and security requirements. In 2025, the Winbond Group operated primarily in Taiwan, with additional presence in Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Israel, Germany, the United States, and India. Nuvoton’s major operating sites were primarily in Taiwan and Japan, while its business sites were located across Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, Israel, the United States, Germany, India, and Singapore to support customer service needs. To ensure on-time delivery, Winbond collaborates with diversified global suppliers across Taiwan, Japan, the United States, Mainland China, South Korea, Belgium, and Germany. Based on 2025 transaction activities, Winbond (Taiwan) worked with 1,100 suppliers, and Winbond (subsidiaries) worked with 698 suppliers. Please refer to the Nuvoton 2025 Sustainability Report.
Suppliers were categorized by procurement category and application, including raw materials, outsourcing, Outsourced semiconductor assembly and testing (OSAT), machinery and equipment, components and spare parts, maintenance and repair, facility engineering, and others (transportation and logistics, waste treatment vendors, waste hauling vendors, IT equipment and software, and general services).
 

 

2024 Composition of Tier-1 Suppliers

Category

Number of Suppliers

Outsourcing/OSAT

15

Machinery and Equipment

28

Raw Materials

83

Components

131

Maintenance and Repair

169

Factory Engineering

228

Others

463



 

2024 Regional Distribution of Significant Suppliers in Tier-1

Region

Number of Suppliers

Taiwan

53

Japan

4

Other Asia-Pacific Regions

2

China

1

Winbond Supplier Management Cycle

 

A robust supplier partnership served as the foundation of Winbond’s supply chain operating system. Winbond implemented a systematic Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) management cycle—from early-stage sourcing and assess, to mid-stage regular supplier assessment, to late-stage deficiency follow-up and corrective actions—to secure stable supply relationships. Winbond not only maintained strict internal control over material technology but also emphasized external collaboration to advance SDG 17. Through close supplier interaction, audits, and continuous improvement, Winbond acted as both a supervisor and an enabler by providing resources and support to drive shared transformation.

Sourcing and Assessment of New Suppliers

Winbond’s new supplier selection mechanism included quality system assessments (covering quality, lead time, service, technology, and supplier’s quality system), the Responsible Business Alliance Code of Conduct, and corporate sustainability requirements. As a member of the Internal Compliance Program (ICP) of the International Trade Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Winbond also screened UN Security Council and Taiwan Ministry of Justice sanctions lists at the traceability stage to safeguard supply chain security.
Suppliers that met compliance requirements were required to provide third-party quality system certificates, Process/Product Change Notice (PCN) management principles, and completed hazardous substances management questionnaires. For outsourced manufacturing suppliers for security products, additional third-party certificates and the “Security Product Outsourced Processing Safety Control Measures Checklist Questionnaire” were required. In 2025, the Winbond Group added 13 new suppliers (5 for Winbond Taiwan, 7 for Nuvoton Taiwan, and 1 for Nuvoton Japan), and 100% passed selection against economic, environmental, and social (including human rights) standards.

Winbond Supplier Code of Conduct Commitment Letter

To ensure a safe working environment in the supply chain, protect employees' dignity and respect, implement environmental responsibility, and adhere to ethical conduct, Winbond Electronics and its subsidiaries have developed the Winbond Electronics Supplier Code of Conduct in accordance with the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA, formerly EICC) Code of Conduct. Winbond requires suppliers to comply with this code and adhere to the laws and regulations of the countries and regions in which they operate. Suppliers are also encouraged to require their suppliers, contractors, and service providers to acknowledge and adopt this code.

The code consists of five sections:

  • Sections A, B, and C outline standards for labor, health and safety, and the environment, respectively.
  • Section D covers business ethics standards.
  • Section E details the elements necessary for a proper management system to enforce the code.

 

The formulation of this code draws on several international guidelines and standards: Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) for environmental management and audit systems. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ILO Declaration of Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and ILO Fundamental Conventions for human rights assessments. Social Accountability International (SAI, SA8000) and the United Nations Convention against Corruption for governance. These references collectively inform the comprehensive "Winbond Electronics Supplier Code of Conduct."

Regular Evaluation of Qualified Suppliers

Winbond conducted an annual evaluation for qualified suppliers. Reflecting Winbond’s production specialization, suppliers were grouped into (1) suppliers and (2) OSAT suppliers. The assessment scope covered core indicators such as quality, cost, delivery, and service. Results were managed through a tiered system: suppliers were categorized as A (excellent), B (good), or C (under review), while OSAT suppliers were graded as Excellent, A, B, or C. To advance sustainable supply chain transformation, Winbond incorporated sustainability performance into regular assessments starting in 2024 and increased the weighting from 5% to 15% in 2025, covering participation in sustainability activities, target-setting, and energy-saving and carbon reduction outcomes. An ESG penalty mechanism was introduced to ensure fairness. Suppliers that failed to meet standards were required to submit improvement plans within one month; persistent underperformance triggered a supplier offboarding process to maintain compliance and resilience.
In 2025, no suppliers in Winbond (Taiwan) were terminated due to major sustainability deficiencies. One supplier received a C grade and implemented improvement measures within one month; all other suppliers and OSAT suppliers achieved B grade or higher and A grade or higher, respectively. Winbond will continue proactive communication, monitoring of government enforcement disclosures, and tracking of supplier operating dynamics to ensure stable supply on a compliance basis, while providing positive incentives for suppliers with strong sustainability performance.
 

Mechanism to Incentivize Suppliers with Strong ESG Performance:

  1. Awards and public recognition are presented during supplier forums or contractor conferences.

  2. The Sustainable Supply Chain Team conducts ESG performance evaluations, audits, and provides capacity-building support for suppliers/contractors. The results are integrated into procurement decision-making processes through positive procurement incentives (e.g., preferential selection, increased order volume).

Example: If a supplier can demonstrate that 100% of waste generated during production is recycled or treated through circular methods, Winbond will increase the procurement volume under equal quality and cost conditions.

Qualified Supplier Audit and Improvement

To manage qualified suppliers’ operations effectively, Winbond’s supplier audit team conducted annual key-sample audits for all qualified suppliers. Desk audits verified valid certificates such as quality management and green review certifications. On-site audits, centered on the RBA 8.0 audit manual, conducted systematic sustainability assessments. In 2025, Winbond conducted 72 audit sessions (24 raw material suppliers, 16 OSAT suppliers, and 32 waste disposal suppliers), identifying 287 improvement recommendations. Compared with 2024, improvement items increased due to expanded sustainability coaching and supplier management needs. Suppliers submitted corrective action plans within agreed timelines, and none were removed from the qualified supplier list due to non-compliance in environment, safety, and health; labor and ethics; product and technical quality; or sustainability management systems. Winbond will expand high-frequency sustainability coaching and training to embed sustainability awareness into supply chain culture and strengthen practical capabilities.

ESG aspectAudit ItemsPass Rate

 

Economic

ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems

100%

IATF 16949:2016

100%

 

 

 

Environmental

ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems

100%

REACH

100%

RoHS

100%

HSPM Hazardous Substance Process Management

100%

SocialRBA Social Responsibilities

100%

 

To foster sustainable collaboration with suppliers in product/technical services, management, and operations, Winbond compiled 146 improvement suggestions from 63 audits conducted in 2024. Suggestions include process control, environmental health and safety management, supplier management, quality management, and management systems. Through proactive engagement with the Winbond supplier audit team, suppliers proactively identified potential risks in their daily operations, thereby implementing preventive measures to meet audit requirements and effectively enhanced their sustainability capabilities.

Items

Improvement Items

Winbond responses

Environmental and Safety Health

  • Oxygen and acetylene cylinder temporary storage areas are only labeled outside the fence, with unclear hazard signage.
  • Emergency shower and eyewash stations do not meet specifications and are not properly cleaned, resulting in water. contamination.
  • Protective clothing storage locations are not clearly indicated.
  • Conduct a comprehensive review of all temporary storage areas and associated hazard labels.
  • Regularly inspect water quality and submit monthly inspection records.
  • Request suppliers to document and provide protective gear layout maps.

Fire protection
system

  • The evacuation exit/evacuation direction indicator lights are not kept on.
  • The pressure of a fire extinguisher in the electronic component disassembly area
    exceeds the upper limit.
  • The placement of materials is messy and affects the handling and escape routes.
  • Regular inspection of indicator lights and fire extinguisher status, and attach inspection records.
  • Recommend implementing 5S management courses to ensure cleanliness and orderliness of the work site.

Labor & Ethics

  • No defined frequency or value limit for gift acceptance policy.
  • Integrity and ethics policies are not communicated in multiple languages for foreign employees
  • Multiple complaint channels are not set up.
  • Establish a monetary cap and management policy for gift acceptance.
  • Publish multilingual versions of policies based on employee nationalities.
  • Require suppliers to establish both digital and physical grievance channels.

Product & Technical Quality

  • Nonconforming product handling lacks clear classification standards.
  • Review process for outbound specifications is undefined and lacks execution records.
  • No defined criteria for product filling and changeover.
  • In-process products are not accompanied by identification cards.
  • Manufacturing abnormality handling procedures are incomplete.
  • Require clearly defined classification criteria for nonconforming products.
  • Formalize the procedure and retain execution records.
  • Define clear standards for pressure differential-based changeovers.
  • Enforce compliance with identification card requirements.
  • Require complete and clearly defined abnormality handling procedures.

Management System

  • Evaluation items and scoring criteria are inconsistent.
  • No clear timing defined for on-the-job training.
  • Internal audit deficiencies are not clearly documented.
  • Business continuity plan lacks risk management considerations.
  • Standardize evaluation items and scoring methodology.
  • Implement regular on-the-job training.
  • Require detailed and specific documentation of audit findings.
  • Incorporate risk-level assessment into business continuity planning.

Corporate Sustainability

  • Senior management lacks comprehensive understanding of ESG principles.
  • Carbon reduction actions and their alignment with reduction targets are not clearly articulated.
  • Conflict mineral data not categorized by product type.
  • Recommend implementing executive ESG training and periodically tracking learning outcomes.
  • In the future, regular sustainability evaluations of suppliers will be conducted to strengthen incentives for suppliers to implement energy-saving and carbon reduction measures, and regular meetings will be held to track progress.
  • Request suppliers to classify data based on RMI guidelines.